<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>matjjin-nehen &#187; Ambiguity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/category/ambiguity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com</link>
	<description>a linguist without a language</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 04:16:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Some linguistic curios</title>
		<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/12/some-linguistic-curios/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/12/some-linguistic-curios/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 07:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jangari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ambiguity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corpus analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Semantics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syntax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/12/some-linguistic-curios/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe it&#8217;s my less-than-prime cognitive state right now, but I&#8217;m beginning to notice little grammatical quirks and ambiguities that I&#8217;d normally have overseen (that was silly of me &#8211; thanks for pointing it out, David) overlooked completely. This web page popped up when I opted out of a frankly unsolicited email advertising list: You have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify">Maybe it&#8217;s my less-than-prime cognitive state right now, but I&#8217;m beginning to notice little grammatical quirks and ambiguities that I&#8217;d normally have <strike>overseen</strike> (that was silly of me &#8211; thanks for pointing it out, David) overlooked completely.</p>
<p align="justify">This web page popped up when I opted out of a frankly unsolicited email advertising list:</p>
<blockquote><p>You have been opted out.</p></blockquote>
<p align="justify">Pardon? Is that an applicativised use of the phrasal verb <em>opt-out</em>? My understanding of this verb is that you <em>opt out</em> of something, you do not get <em>opted out</em>. Then again, if this use doesn&#8217;t strike you as odd; if it&#8217;s alright to you, to say that someone has opted you out of something, please feel free to <a href="http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/12/some-linguistic-curios/#respond">digress</a>.</p>
<p align="justify">Incidentally, corpus.google.com¹ shows that the strings <em>have opted out</em> and <em>has opted out</em> together generate about 188,400 results, while <em>been</em> and <em>get opted out</em> only generate about 2,000. <em>Be opted out</em> is surprisingly common though, with about 12,500 hits, so maybe it isn&#8217;t as ungrammatical as I thought.</p>
<p align="justify">The other thing I noticed today was the packaging on a salami from the supermarket, which read:</p>
<blockquote><p>Ideal for entertaining.<br />
For entertaining recipes, visit our website.</p></blockquote>
<p align="justify">Honestly. Recipes are matter-of-fact, functional things. How entertaining do they have to be?</p>
<p align="justify">Seriously though, I was just having a conversation about a very similar thing in the linguistics room on irc.freenode.net. I was previously under the impression that the term <em>operating system</em> is a paraphrase of something like <em>a system that operates</em>, in which case you&#8217;d call <em>operating</em> a verb participle, I guess. But since an <em>operating system</em> is actually <em>a system that pertains to operating</em>, it&#8217;s accurate enough to call it a gerund.</p>
<p align="center">~</p>
<p align="justify">In other news, I just upgraded my wordpress software from 2.3.1 to 2.3.2, because apparently there was a security fault with 2.3.1, and readers were occasionally able to see drafts, which are usually hidden. In fact I noticed a while back that my stats page showed many of my drafts as having been visited, which concerned me slightly. But it should be fixed now, so I can feel free to draft on.</p>
<p align="center">~</p>
<p align="justify">¹I&#8217;ve mentioned corpus.google.com before, and I&#8217;ve been using it now for well over a year. In fact up until an hour ago I though I had originally coined it. But it has come to my attention that there was a <a href="http://keywords.oxus.net/archives/2005/01/23/corpusgooglecom/" target="_blank">blog post</a> that antedates <a href="http://langguj.blogspot.com/2006/10/c-o-r-r-o-b-o-r-e-e.html#c115992517468763220" target="_blank">my first use</a> by over 18 months. Still, I certainly came up with it independently, so it&#8217;s much like arguing over whether it was Newton or Leibniz who invented calculus.</p>
<p align="justify">Here&#8217;s the relevant bit:</p>
<blockquote>
<p align="justify">I wonder if Google will eventually offer such a service themselves? “corpus.google.com”? (Apologies to those who thought this post was actually announcing such a service.)</p>
</blockquote>
<p align="justify">Predictably, I&#8217;ve also variously had to offer up similar apologies to some of my readers who were misled by my reference, such as David.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/12/some-linguistic-curios/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
