<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stolen, not Separated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/</link>
	<description>a linguist without a language</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:27:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Damn I&#8217;m good &#187; matjjin-nehen</title>
		<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/comment-page-1/#comment-881</link>
		<dc:creator>Damn I&#8217;m good &#187; matjjin-nehen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 04:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/#comment-881</guid>
		<description>[...] The opposition are most concerned over the term Stolen Generation apparently. Perhaps they’d prefer to use Gerard Henderson’s newest euphemism, Separated Generation? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The opposition are most concerned over the term Stolen Generation apparently. Perhaps they’d prefer to use Gerard Henderson’s newest euphemism, Separated Generation? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eleven years in the making &#187; matjjin-nehen</title>
		<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/comment-page-1/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Eleven years in the making &#187; matjjin-nehen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/#comment-878</guid>
		<description>[...] The opposition, under Dr Brendan Nelson, has given its in-principle support, but wants to see the exact wording before it goes to parliament, adding that &#8220;It&#8217;s essential that the Australian people have the opportunity to understand what is going to be said by their Parliament on their behalf.&#8221; (Update: the opposition are most concerned over the term Stolen Generation apparently. Perhaps they&#8217;d prefer to use Gerard Henderson&#8217;s newest euphemism, Separated Generation?) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The opposition, under Dr Brendan Nelson, has given its in-principle support, but wants to see the exact wording before it goes to parliament, adding that &#8220;It&#8217;s essential that the Australian people have the opportunity to understand what is going to be said by their Parliament on their behalf.&#8221; (Update: the opposition are most concerned over the term Stolen Generation apparently. Perhaps they&#8217;d prefer to use Gerard Henderson&#8217;s newest euphemism, Separated Generation?) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jangari</title>
		<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/comment-page-1/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>jangari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/#comment-724</guid>
		<description>Well, that was courteous of the separators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that was courteous of the separators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wamut</title>
		<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>wamut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/#comment-721</guid>
		<description>it was my friend&#039;s bag and yes, the two were reunited  a-couple-of-hundred-dollars-PRIV but new-digital-camera-my-Prada-glasses-creditcards-personal-effects-COMIT.  Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it was my friend&#8217;s bag and yes, the two were reunited  a-couple-of-hundred-dollars-PRIV but new-digital-camera-my-Prada-glasses-creditcards-personal-effects-COMIT.  Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jangari</title>
		<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/comment-page-1/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>jangari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/#comment-719</guid>
		<description>I agree that &lt;i&gt;removed&lt;/i&gt; would be a lot better than &lt;i&gt;separated&lt;/i&gt;, as it implies an agent, but unlike &lt;i&gt;stolen&lt;/i&gt; it doesn&#039;t preclude the parents&#039; consent. You can give permission for something being &#039;removed&#039;, but you generally aren&#039;t asked for permission for something being &#039;stolen&#039;, or to put it another way, you hire &#039;removalists&#039;, &#039;thieves&#039; do it for free.

By the way, did you and your bag get reunited?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that <i>removed</i> would be a lot better than <i>separated</i>, as it implies an agent, but unlike <i>stolen</i> it doesn&#8217;t preclude the parents&#8217; consent. You can give permission for something being &#8216;removed&#8217;, but you generally aren&#8217;t asked for permission for something being &#8217;stolen&#8217;, or to put it another way, you hire &#8216;removalists&#8217;, &#8216;thieves&#8217; do it for free.</p>
<p>By the way, did you and your bag get reunited?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wamut</title>
		<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/comment-page-1/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>wamut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/#comment-711</guid>
		<description>I was going to try n be funny n say that someone separated my friend&#039;s bag at a nightclub the other night but then the semantics are thrown out of whack.

&#039;Separated generation&#039;?  that&#039;s just silly.  every generation is separated from the one before it anyway... like I have no idea what these Gen-Y folk do these days.

If &#039;stolen&#039; is too harsh, what about &#039;removed generation&#039;... that&#039;s a bit more passive.  Why don&#039;t we tell Gerard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to try n be funny n say that someone separated my friend&#8217;s bag at a nightclub the other night but then the semantics are thrown out of whack.</p>
<p>&#8216;Separated generation&#8217;?  that&#8217;s just silly.  every generation is separated from the one before it anyway&#8230; like I have no idea what these Gen-Y folk do these days.</p>
<p>If &#8217;stolen&#8217; is too harsh, what about &#8216;removed generation&#8217;&#8230; that&#8217;s a bit more passive.  Why don&#8217;t we tell Gerard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
