<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stolen, not Separated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/</link>
	<description>a linguist without a language</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Damn I&#8217;m good &#187; matjjin-nehen</title>
		<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/comment-page-1/#comment-881</link>
		<dc:creator>Damn I&#8217;m good &#187; matjjin-nehen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 04:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/#comment-881</guid>
		<description>[...] The opposition are most concerned over the term Stolen Generation apparently. Perhaps they’d prefer to use Gerard Henderson’s newest euphemism, Separated Generation? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The opposition are most concerned over the term Stolen Generation apparently. Perhaps they’d prefer to use Gerard Henderson’s newest euphemism, Separated Generation? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eleven years in the making &#187; matjjin-nehen</title>
		<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/comment-page-1/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Eleven years in the making &#187; matjjin-nehen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/#comment-878</guid>
		<description>[...] The opposition, under Dr Brendan Nelson, has given its in-principle support, but wants to see the exact wording before it goes to parliament, adding that &#8220;It&#8217;s essential that the Australian people have the opportunity to understand what is going to be said by their Parliament on their behalf.&#8221; (Update: the opposition are most concerned over the term Stolen Generation apparently. Perhaps they&#8217;d prefer to use Gerard Henderson&#8217;s newest euphemism, Separated Generation?) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The opposition, under Dr Brendan Nelson, has given its in-principle support, but wants to see the exact wording before it goes to parliament, adding that &#8220;It&#8217;s essential that the Australian people have the opportunity to understand what is going to be said by their Parliament on their behalf.&#8221; (Update: the opposition are most concerned over the term Stolen Generation apparently. Perhaps they&#8217;d prefer to use Gerard Henderson&#8217;s newest euphemism, Separated Generation?) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jangari</title>
		<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/comment-page-1/#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>jangari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/#comment-724</guid>
		<description>Well, that was courteous of the separators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that was courteous of the separators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wamut</title>
		<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>wamut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/#comment-721</guid>
		<description>it was my friend's bag and yes, the two were reunited  a-couple-of-hundred-dollars-PRIV but new-digital-camera-my-Prada-glasses-creditcards-personal-effects-COMIT.  Go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it was my friend&#8217;s bag and yes, the two were reunited  a-couple-of-hundred-dollars-PRIV but new-digital-camera-my-Prada-glasses-creditcards-personal-effects-COMIT.  Go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jangari</title>
		<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/comment-page-1/#comment-719</link>
		<dc:creator>jangari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/#comment-719</guid>
		<description>I agree that &lt;i&gt;removed&lt;/i&gt; would be a lot better than &lt;i&gt;separated&lt;/i&gt;, as it implies an agent, but unlike &lt;i&gt;stolen&lt;/i&gt; it doesn't preclude the parents' consent. You can give permission for something being 'removed', but you generally aren't asked for permission for something being 'stolen', or to put it another way, you hire 'removalists', 'thieves' do it for free.

By the way, did you and your bag get reunited?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that <i>removed</i> would be a lot better than <i>separated</i>, as it implies an agent, but unlike <i>stolen</i> it doesn&#8217;t preclude the parents&#8217; consent. You can give permission for something being &#8216;removed&#8217;, but you generally aren&#8217;t asked for permission for something being &#8217;stolen&#8217;, or to put it another way, you hire &#8216;removalists&#8217;, &#8216;thieves&#8217; do it for free.</p>
<p>By the way, did you and your bag get reunited?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wamut</title>
		<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/comment-page-1/#comment-711</link>
		<dc:creator>wamut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2008/01/15/stolen-not-separated/#comment-711</guid>
		<description>I was going to try n be funny n say that someone separated my friend's bag at a nightclub the other night but then the semantics are thrown out of whack.

'Separated generation'?  that's just silly.  every generation is separated from the one before it anyway... like I have no idea what these Gen-Y folk do these days.

If 'stolen' is too harsh, what about 'removed generation'... that's a bit more passive.  Why don't we tell Gerard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to try n be funny n say that someone separated my friend&#8217;s bag at a nightclub the other night but then the semantics are thrown out of whack.</p>
<p>&#8216;Separated generation&#8217;?  that&#8217;s just silly.  every generation is separated from the one before it anyway&#8230; like I have no idea what these Gen-Y folk do these days.</p>
<p>If &#8217;stolen&#8217; is too harsh, what about &#8216;removed generation&#8217;&#8230; that&#8217;s a bit more passive.  Why don&#8217;t we tell Gerard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
