Thu 7 Jun 2007
Canada (update: and Australia) versus Indigenous Peoples
Posted by jangari under Education, Indigenous, Linguistics, Politics
[5] Comments
Canada elected a new government 18 months ago and it appears that they’re trying to prevent the UN Human Rights Council’s Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples from being approved (adopted, in the official terminology) by the general assembly. To put this into perspective, the decleration and resolution, avaliable from here, took 24 years to negotiate.
I went and had a look at the resolution to see what could have been so odious that Canada would want to prevent it from becoming bound by international law, but it seems reasonable to me. Here’s an interesting excerpt that is especially relevant in a current local debate in Australia.
Article 13
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to revitalize, use, develop and transmit to future generations their histories, languages, oral traditions, philosophies, writing systems and literatures, and to designate and retain their own names for communities, places and persons.
2. States shall take effective measures to ensure this right is protected and also to ensure that indigenous peoples can understand and be understood in political, legal and administrative proceedings, where necessary through the provision of interpretation or by other appropriate means.
Article 14
1. Indigenous peoples have the right to establish and control their educational systems and institutions providing education in their own languages, in a manner appropriate to their cultural methods of teaching and learning.
2. Indigenous individuals, particularly children, have the right to all levels and forms of education of the State without discrimination.
3. States shall, in conjunction with indigenous peoples, take effective measures, in order for indigenous individuals, particularly children, including those living outside their communities, to have access, when possible, to an education in their own culture and provided in their own language.
I draw particular attention to the last sentence, the one that orders States to provide education to indigenous people in their own language. So if Canada aren’t successful in hindering this declaration any further, bilingual education could become a matter of international law. Interesting.
~
<update>
It appears that Howard may have had a slight helping hand in Canada’s change of heart, rather than it being due to merely a change in government.
The newspaper is quoting unnamed political sources as saying Mr Howard convinced Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper during his visit that the declaration would be “problematic.”
Although, ‘unnamed’ sources are always a bit sketchy, the timeline is curious:
Mr Howard visited Ottawa and the Toronto Globe and Mail says things began to happen within days.
</update>
5 Responses to “ Canada (update: and Australia) versus Indigenous Peoples ”
Comments:
Leave a Reply
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
Pingback from UN votes on indigenous rights « matjjin-nehen
September 12th, 2007 at 12:28 pm[...] “Have not been quite so keen” is putting it very mildly. The Declaration has been about 24 years in the making, but suffered a setback earlier this year, when, possibly under pressure from John Howard, the recently elected Canadian government withdrew their support. [...]

June 7th, 2007 at 6:40 pm
Ahhh but you need to activate your inner lawyer here.
“when possible”.
So even if it does pass I don’t think it will push any government (ours particularly) into action.
Still….Blame Canada.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=buSwRxvYPZI
June 8th, 2007 at 2:00 am
otoh, Nunavut is trying to boost the status of their indigenous languages. If they’re successful, Inuktitut will be mandatory in schools up to grade 12, and Nunavut will have 4 official languages: English, French, Inuktitut and Innuinaqtun.
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/north/story/2007/06/06/nu-language.html?ref=rss
June 8th, 2007 at 8:09 am
Yes, Cooper, I noticed that but I deliberately glossed over it. Just what defines ‘possible’ is anyone’s guess.
Thanks for the link, John, I never knew that there was a Nunavut government. The article suggests there may be some difficulty, such as the small business owner having to hire multilingual staff, which realistically, could be detrimental. But as far as languages go, the more the merrier, I say.
June 25th, 2007 at 11:47 am
I am from Perth WA. I have recently been backpacking through Eastern Europe and what I realised is that in a couple of hours you can be in a new country there. What I also realised as electronic communication and travel increases, many people are starting to talk in English – it is truly becoming the international language. To introduce specialised language education for each aboriginal dialect/tribe (and there are many dialects around Aussie) would be an administrative nightmare. It would also be a another barrier for white and black australia to understand each other. I believe to help indigenous Australia, we have to stop the welfare cycle and part of that is people knowing their culture again. But we also have to realise that its not 200 yrs ago where any community can live in a bubble – and common language is integral for trade, tourism, etc which can help indigenous people have pride and strength in themselves in this country.