Fri 4 May 2007
McArthur River Bill Passes 17 to 5 (Updated)
Posted by jangari under Environment, Indigenous, Politics
[14] Comments
There’s been a further development to the saga of Xstrata and the McArthur River, which I wrote about earlier in the week.
I missed this when it came out last night, but Clare Martin’s legislation, which prevents traditional owners from launching legal action to stop Xstrata from diverting the river and basically digging the world’s largest zinc and lead mine on their land, was passed by the Northern Territory parliament, 17 votes to 5.
The only people to vote against this Bill – which heralds the return to European domination of indigenous peoples through the courts¹ – were two independents and three indigenous Labor MLAs, Member for Macdonnell Alison Anderson, Member for Stuart Karl Hampton and Member for Arnhem Barbara McCarthy.
Barbara McCarthy was most vocal in parliament last night, taking the floor during the final reading of the Bill as a last-ditch effort to thwart the legislation, futile as it was.
She said the people of the Gulf Region are mourning the death of a prominent leader, and to pass the Bill in the middle of sorry business is the worst sign of disrespect to them.
‘The worst sign of disrespect’. That’s a cruel understatement. This is blatant disregard of the Kurdanji people’s home, land and culture and no commercial need for lead or zinc is quite strong enough to override that. I gave this quote from Martin in my last post on this, but it seems more relevant here, especially when juxtaposed against Barbara McCarthy’s sentiments about the disrespect:
We’re doing this with the greatest respect for everyone involved.
You can stick a noxious weed in a bucket of dirt and call it a flower, Ms Martin, but it don’t make it so.
~
¹Sorry for editorialising, but it really infuriates me that short term economic advantage from mining companies can trump not only the imperatives of the environment, that doesn’t surprise me anymore, but also the cultural considerations of the rightful owners and custodians of the land. This is not the sort of thing that makes people proud and patriotic, flag-waving, happy little vegemites. I, for one, am increasingly ashamed to be an Australian when I hear stuff like this.
~
<update>
May 8: Last night The 7:30 Report carried this story, outlining the history of the case, of the mine, of the community’s protest of the mine’s expansion. They also spoke to Barbara McCarthy about her strong opposition, not only to the legislation, but the timing of it – two days before the funeral of the man who most vigorously fought Xstrata. Transcripts and video available on this page (contains footage of the deceased).
</update>
14 Responses to “ McArthur River Bill Passes 17 to 5 (Updated) ”
Comments:
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
Pingback from Back from Borroloola «
May 10th, 2007 at 12:25 pm[...] Matjjin-nehen [...]
-
Pingback from “With the Greatest Respect” « matjjin-nehen
July 26th, 2007 at 4:00 pm[...] if it weren’t bad enough that the bill was passed almost unanimously, the only dissenters being the indigenous Labor and independent MLAs (an indigenous opposition [...]

May 4th, 2007 at 2:44 pm
That’s absolutely disgraceful. Very sad.
The only positive – Barb McCarthy.. she’s ace and she’s my MP and I get to vote for her (crikey, how often do you get excited about the person you vote for in an election).
May 4th, 2007 at 10:39 pm
Indeed. It’s like mourning twice around – given that Xtrata already had the go-ahead, then they got stopped (Yay!!) but now the Martin govt has paved the way for them again…
Barb McCarthy is absolutley kickarse. She’s from Booroloola.
May 5th, 2007 at 10:13 am
Gagu, I can’t empathise. My local members are Tony Abbott for federal and Jillian Skinner for state.
I need to move.
May 7th, 2007 at 10:17 pm
LOL I feel sorry for you man…I really do.
May 11th, 2007 at 6:15 pm
“The only people to vote against this Bill – which heralds the return to European domination of indigenous peoples through the courts¹ – were two independents and three indigenous Labor MLAs”.
Jangari, this decision is so crazy. Will the ALP expel the three indigenous MLAs who crossed the floor? That is how it usually works with labor. An a.l.p upper house member copped that, in tassie, recently.
May 11th, 2007 at 6:22 pm
Really?
Doesn’t Paul Lennon realise that that’s what, ahem, democracy is?! Lennon shits me. I hold him partly responsible for the logging of old-growth forests in Tasmania and the loss of two of the four federal seats, because he has a morbid fear of The Greens.
What was the issue this time?
May 11th, 2007 at 6:48 pm
I believe it was the pulp mill that Gunns are trying to force on the population.
May 12th, 2007 at 3:31 pm
Labor can’t chuck them out. If you take Barb McCarthy, there’s no way Labor would expect to vote for it considering she’s from Borroloola. Also, it would be silly for Labor to chuck out MP who poll at 80% at electiontime.
The question that I’m wondering is, is why other Aboriginal MPs *didn’t* cross the floor : Marion Scrymgour and Elliot McAdam…
May 12th, 2007 at 4:25 pm
There’s unfortunately way too much toeing of the party line going on. Parliamentarians should be encouraged to cross the floor if they find the legislation to be bad in some respect. To an extent of course, I mean, when we elect a party in any given seat, we have a reasonable expectation that they represent the policy of that party right? You can’t put every matter to a conscience vote.
I’m tempted to say that the whole Gunns matter is disgraceful, but I don’t know enough about the legal thing, only that Gunns were recently given the go-ahead to commence legal proceedings. But the pulp mill is an absolutely horrendous policy.
This is why I vote Green (well, that, and the fact that Labor put next to no effort into the blue-ribbon Liberal seat in which I reside).
May 13th, 2007 at 12:48 pm
Jangari,the party system tends to work against democracy, as you suggest. Large companies, of the environment destroying kind, are another hindrance.
Somehow, shareholders are allowed extra votes, than us, or they will pull up their bucks and, supposedly, goodbye to all those jobs. It is the same tactic that Xstrata and Gunns used in these two despicable cases.
Methinks, we are following Nauru in becoming a large, wasted, pit. The McArthur River and the Kurdanji peoples’ home is likely to be stuffed, for no other reason than pure greed.
May 14th, 2007 at 9:06 am
Dang, I thought I replied to this yesterday. WordPress must be having a Blogger moment!
It would be slightly more equitable if not only shareholders but stakeholders were given a say in such decisions, especially since they stand to lose an awful lot more than money.
I know it’s near impossible to implement or manage, but the (I hate using Howardian phrases like this) mum-and-dad investors can only lose their invested capital, which would be a shame for them, but that’s the capitalist game. The Kurdanji may lose part of their traditional land, their river, their Rainbow Serpent dreaming, their culture, but probably more importantly, their sovereignty.
May 14th, 2007 at 10:35 pm
How do you deal with that Jangari?
Obviously, it is good to keep SOME “mum-and-dad investors”, in the loop.
Some just stick their money/super into banks and shares etc and are very supportive of indigenous issues but may have shares in Xstrata and Gunns and would not even know about it.