<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Language ownership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2006/12/01/language-ownership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2006/12/01/language-ownership/</link>
	<description>a linguist without a language</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 04:48:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two Stories on Language Ownership &#171; Literal-Minded</title>
		<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2006/12/01/language-ownership/comment-page-1/#comment-1964</link>
		<dc:creator>Two Stories on Language Ownership &#171; Literal-Minded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 02:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2006/12/01/language-ownership/#comment-1964</guid>
		<description>[...] Jangari of matjjin-nehen takes a crack at defining the circumstances in which speakers of a language can claim ownership of it in this post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jangari of matjjin-nehen takes a crack at defining the circumstances in which speakers of a language can claim ownership of it in this post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quote of the week #6 - Ninglun on my use of the term fascism/fascist &#171; The Thinker&#8217;s Podium</title>
		<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2006/12/01/language-ownership/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Quote of the week #6 - Ninglun on my use of the term fascism/fascist &#171; The Thinker&#8217;s Podium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 07:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2006/12/01/language-ownership/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>[...] brings up what I guess would in Jangari&#8217;s vernacular, would be an issue of a kind of &#8220;language ownership&#8220;. Do theists own the term &#8220;atheist&#8221; because they came up with it or do atheists [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] brings up what I guess would in Jangari&#8217;s vernacular, would be an issue of a kind of &#8220;language ownership&#8220;. Do theists own the term &#8220;atheist&#8221; because they came up with it or do atheists [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pre-Columbian Poultry &#171; matjjin-nehen</title>
		<link>http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2006/12/01/language-ownership/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Pre-Columbian Poultry &#171; matjjin-nehen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 09:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matjjin-nehen.com/2006/12/01/language-ownership/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] about 6 months ago I wrote about Microsoft using the Mapudungun language in their latest Word release without the consent of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about 6 months ago I wrote about Microsoft using the Mapudungun language in their latest Word release without the consent of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
